The world today is rapidly evolving across multiple dimensions, with traditional practices being swiftly replaced by technology. The internet and digital tools have transformed not only the way we think but also the sources from which we derive our thoughts, and the platforms we use to express them. In present times, the internet, computers, and applications like WhatsApp have become essential parts of human life. However, this transformation is not confined to individuals alone—it is also significantly impacting the legal system, including the execution of laws. Many times, judiciary and police are taking help of digitals tools to deal with crimes to prevent it or cure it. Where they not only use digital tools to watch on criminals, to take their attendance but also use it to take access of websites, other apps so that further crime and other things can be prevented. This use of digitalisation has given birth to the One emerging concept that is "Digital arrest" which rampantly misused by the scammers and becomes a wake-up call for police, judiciary, and other legal authorities. Other than that, digital restrictions prior to arrest and after arrest raises many numerous legal, constitutional, and validity-related challenges since there are no specific laws on that which permits or denying the use of such digital restrictions after or prior to arrest. Therefore, through this research paper, the researcher aims to study the concept of digital restrictions, Digital arrest and its legal standing, its position within the framework of existing laws, related legal questions, the judiciary's perspective on the issue, the opportunities it creates for criminal misuse, and possible solutions to these challenges. However, the concept of digital restrictions raises several legal and practical concerns. Questions arise regarding the legal foundation of this practice: under which law does it operate, how is it implemented, and does it have formal legal recognition? Concerns also emerge about its impact on fundamental rights—if digital restrictions infringe upon such rights, can their use still be justified? Furthermore, there are instances where fraudsters exploit public fear of such restrictions by impersonating police and other officials and falsely claiming to place victims under “digital arrest”, a practice that has no basis in law. This creates the need for clear mechanisms to identify, prevent, and punish such misuse.